Skip to content

Italian GP review

3rd September 2018

It’s been a busy few months in the world of Formula 1. Daniel Ricciardo has made a surprising switch from Red Bull to Renault, Fernando Alonso has made a less surprising but disappointing decision to walk away from F1 after a fairly dire spell with Mclaren, Ferrari have chosen to break away with tradition and give youngster Charles Leclerc a chance in 2019, while in contrast to his demeanor on most race weekends, Kimi Raikkonnen has decided that he’s still motivated enough to compete in F1 and has signed a two year deal with the Sauber team where he started his career back in 2001. Elsewhere, Force India went into administration but has come out of it now being owned by Lawrence Stroll and his business partners. Oh and Carlos Sainz and Formula 2 ace Lando Norris have signed for Mclaren. F1’s 2019 ‘silly season’ has been a crazy one!

On track however, the story coming away Monza, and Europe, has really got to be “How did Ferrari, with the fastest car, a front row lock out and huge home crowd support come away from the weekend further behind in the championship than when they went into it?”

To really look at how this unfolded, we need to go back eight weeks to the tyre selection process. Ferrari arrived in Monza with only one set of Soft tyres for Vettel and only two for Raikkonnen. We’ve seen other people do this and I’ve never really understood why teams put themselves into a corner like this.

The Pirelli tyres are extraordinarily tricky to manage – much more than the Bridgestones or Michelins we had previously in F1 and by now every team knows that. I can sort of understand bringing only 1 set of the hardest tyre because it’s very rarely used, but certainly with the two softer choices, you want to give yourself enough of a chance to run the tyre in free practice so you get a good idea of what you’ve got when you bolt it on in the Grand Prix. Yes, they all have simulation tools and reports from dozens of engineers and ‘tyre groups’ but there’s nothing like good old fashioned real life practice sometimes.

Lewis Hamilton really forced his way into the victory this weekend and Mercedes played the team tactics game much better than their Italian rivals. There was a feeling in the paddock that the Ferrari was the quicker car all weekend but the Qualifying battle amongst the top 3 was closer than everyone expected. It truly was one of the best sessions I’ve seen in a long time.

The most confusing thing from Qualifying was Ferrari’s decision not to back their main title contender. The slipstream effect on the straights in Monza far outweighs the loss of downforce in the corners. At other circuits, drivers try to do their Qualifying laps with about a 7 second gap to the car in front in order to avoid any turbulent air. In Monza, they were all aiming to be about 2.5 seconds behind another car, which the teams found to be a good balance between beneficial on the straights but not too damaging in the corners and braking zones.

Valtteri Bottas seemed to suggest after Qualifying that being in front of Lewis gave the Englishman a benefit of a couple of tenths which was exactly what Mercedes wanted him to do. Rightly, they are very clear now that if they have to win the World Championship, they need to start playing the number 1, number 2 card. So, when Raikkonnen came out of the pits behind Vettel for both runs in Q3, it was very confusing. Kimi himself seemed slightly unsure of the plan as there was a bit of team radio chat on the final outlap, asking if they stay in that order. Seb got a distant tow from Lewis but Kimi got a much better double slipstream which I’m sure didn’t please their German ace. One thing’s for sure, in the dominant Ferrari era of Michael Schumacher, Ross Brawn and Jean Todt, there’s no way that the number 2 driver would have been given the same freedom.

Ahead of the race, I did wonder if Ferrari had decided to implement team orders. The easiest thing to do would have been to tell Kimi not to fight Sebastian into the first chicane or if they don’t sort it out straight away, then let him past into the second chicane before playing the rear gunner role. This was a golden opportunity to reduce the points gap from 17 to 7 by scoring a 1-2 when they clearly had the pace to do it.

As things transpired, Kimi moved across the track in front of Seb at the start and the two red cars fought hard into the first chicane. Once that was sorted, they then headed through the Curva Grande with Lewis firmly in the slipstream and ready to pounce. At that point, if they chose to play the team game, Kimi would have just stayed to the right and opened the door for Sebastian to go past cleanly, but instead he went to defend the inside which boxed Seb in a bit and opened up a gap for Lewis to dive around the outside.

The collision between Lewis and Sebastian was just a typical racing incident that we’ve seen many times at a chicane in Monza – two drivers both charging hard and neither really wanting to give in but with the benefit of hindsight, I think Sebastian will regret how he played that. Every wheel to wheel battle you do as a racing driver is a game of risk versus reward and it’s clear that Seb would have been better off letting Lewis take the place at that moment. Being 3rd on lap 1 was going to be a lot better than facing the wrong way.

The next key point of the race came around the pitstops. Kimi and Lewis were driving beautifully up front in that opening stint. Mercedes told Lewis to do the opposite of Kimi on strategy and when the Ferrari man pitted on lap 20, Lewis delivered three very strong laps on his worn Super Softs. This was key to what happened to Kimi later in the race.

With any race tyre, in general, the more gently you use it during the early laps of it’s first heat cycle, the longer they will last. Because Lewis was pushing like crazy and able to deliver some very fast laps, Ferrari was forced to tell Kimi to push hard straight away, not allowing him to bring the tyres in gently. This meant that he started to get some blistering on the rear tyres sooner than they expected and when Mercedes played the team card of backing Bottas up into Raikkonnen, Kimi had to battle on in the dirty air which didn’t help the blistering.

It was interesting to see how many people on social media were tweeting with comments like “Lewis only won that race because of the Mercedes team tactics.” I think that’s unfair. He won that race because Ferrari didn’t play the team tactics game as well all weekend and starting with the tyre choices. He won that race by being opportunistic and with calculated aggression on lap 1. He won that race because he unleashed some impressive pace in those laps after Kimi’s pitstop and forced the Finn to go too hard too soon on his Soft tyres.

It also really winds me up when people say we’re being biased towards Lewis. Last year, with 7 races to go, Lewis led Sebastian by 3 points when Mercedes still had the faster car. This year, he’s 30 points in front when the Ferrari has been more competitive than in 2017. That’s not being biased – that’s just fact.

I would actually have loved to see Kimi win in Monza, as I think he’s driving very well at the moment and it would have been a great story for F1. When Seb and Ferrari won in Spa, we complimented them and the brilliant job they did. They’re going to need plenty more of those weekends and some good team tactics between now and Abu Dhabi to turn around that deficit!

CategoriesKC's Column

Leave a reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *